A few of you asked what I would say if I were to rant about the current state of affairs of patent law in the United States. The patent litigation systems is screwed up beyond belief. Thank your local congressman (probably a former plaintiff attorney) and the state of Texas. Here are some sobering statistics.
– Most cases are brought in the Eastern District of Texas these days, regardless of where the companies in question are located;
– The Eastern District of Texas likes this “cottage industry” and therefore the courts never (to my knowledge) allow folks to transfer out of the E.D. of Texas;
– The advantage for plaintiffs to file in Texas is that the courts never (to my knowledge) invalidate a plaintiff’s patent during the course of events. In all other jurisdictions, when a plaintiff sues a defendant for infringement, there is always a chance the plaintiff loses its patent on a counterclaim – not here;
– According to my friends at Cooley Godward Kronish, the plaintiff wins 92% of the time in E.D. of Texas for cases that go to the jury; and
– Costs are completely out of control to defend these types of cases.
The following data is from the 2005 Report from the American Intellectual Property Law Association Economic Survey.
For controversies involving counsel from any major metropolitan city, the 75th percentile number below is the price tag you should be looking at. Bottom line, these are expensive, expensive propositions.
Litigation costs of controversies where $25M or less in damages is concerned:
Through close of discovery (pre trial)
75th percentile: $2M
Median: $1.25M
25th percentile: $600k
Through trial and appeal
75th: $3.5M
Median: $2M
25th: $1.2M
Litigation costs where the controversy is over $25M in damages:
Through close of discovery (pre trial)
75th percentile: $4M
Median: $3M
25th percentile: $1.4M
Through trial and appeal
75th: $6M
Median: $4.5M
25th: $2.5M
Do I even have to rant? Isn’t it obvious what’s going on here? The E.D. of Texas has decided that it wants to be the forum of choice for plaintiffs and patent trolls. It’s completely stacked the deck in favor of one side. The federal government (run by a bunch of former plaintiff attorneys) turns a blind eye to the constitutional issues.
It doesn’t matter who is right and who is wrong, defendants must settle of incur crushing legal costs.
Brad thinks that software patents should be abolished. I used to think he was crazy and mumble something about protecting our rights in Asia and elsewhere. Maybe he’s right. This is a total resource suck, business tax and reallocation of wealth.
What really burns me is that all of this seems completely unconstitutional, but I’ll admit that I didn’t attend that class in law school as diligently as I could have.
Before I get 100 comments on “What about the company who has a valid complaint?” I’ll tell you two things about my experiences: 1. “real” patent cases don’t get litigated in the E.D. of Texas and 2. the vast majority of patent cases I’ve seen in the past decade were all “shakedowns” to me.
Rant over.
